South America (1828–1971 CE)

Republics, Frontiers, and the Modern Continent

Geographic Definition of South America
The region of South America encompasses all lands south of the Isthmus of Panama, including the subregions of South America Major—stretching from Colombia and Venezuela through Brazil, Bolivia, Peru, Ecuador, Paraguay, Uruguay, and northern Argentina and Chile—and Peninsular South America, which includes southern Chile, southern Argentina, Patagonia, Tierra del Fuego, the Falkland Islands (Islas Malvinas), and the Juan Fernández Islands.

Anchors include the Andes cordillera, the Altiplano, the Amazon, Orinoco, and Magdalena river systems, the Gran Chaco, the Llanos, the Pampas, and the Patagonian steppe, reaching south to the Strait of Magellan and the sub-Antarctic seas. This continental expanse unites rainforest and desert, mountain and plain, forming the world’s largest tropical forest system and one of its most diverse temperate frontiers.

Geography and Political Frontiers

Between 1828 and 1971, South America completed its transition from colonial empires to a constellation of modern nation-states. The nineteenth century was an age of consolidation—of borders, capitals, and frontiers—while the twentieth introduced urbanization, industrialization, and social revolution.

In the north and center, the Andes and Amazon defined the heartlands of South America Major: Brazil’s vast interior was opened by coffee, railways, and later industry; Peru, Bolivia, and Chile struggled over mineral frontiers; and the River Plate republics forged new economies on cattle and grain.
Farther south, Peninsular South America—Patagonia, Tierra del Fuego, and the southern islands—shifted from Indigenous autonomy to national incorporation under Chile, Argentina, and Britain. The conquest of Indigenous lands completed the continental frame of modern South America.

Climate and Environmental Shifts

With the close of the Little Ice Age, climate gradually warmed, though variability remained pronounced.

• Andes: Glacial retreat altered water regimes; earthquakes and volcanic eruptions repeatedly struck Chile and Peru.

• Amazon basin: Rainfall oscillated between flood and drought decades; deforestation and frontier ranching began to modify hydrology by the mid-twentieth century.

• Llanos, Chaco, and Pampas: Drought and locust plagues punctuated otherwise fertile cycles; agriculture expanded through mechanization.

• Patagonia and southern Chile: Winds remained fierce but temperatures moderated, fostering European colonization and ranching.

Environmental transformation followed human frontiers: new roads, plantations, and mines redrew both ecology and economy.

Subsistence and Settlement

Agrarian foundations persisted even as industry grew.

• Andean republics: Highland farmers maintained terraced maize and potato fields; haciendas, mines, and plantations supplied global markets with silver, tin, and copper.

• Brazil: Coffee, sugar, and later industrial production in São Paulo and Rio de Janeiro powered national growth; Amazon rubber boomed and collapsed; steel and oil replaced gold.

• River Plate region: Argentina and Uruguay exported beef, wool, and grain, their estancias mechanized by the early twentieth century. Paraguay remained agrarian after its devastation in the War of the Triple Alliance (1864–1870).

• Northern Andes and Caribbean coasts: Cocoa, coffee, and oil wealth transformed Venezuela and Colombia; pipelines and ports knit the mountains to the sea.

• Southern Chile and Argentina: Wheat, forestry, and later nitrate and copper mining followed Indigenous dispossession; sheep ranching dominated Patagonia; Tierra del Fuego mixed gold rushes and estancias.

• Falklands and Juan Fernández: Remote yet strategic, they sustained small ranching and fishing communities within imperial or national frameworks.

Urbanization intensified: Buenos Aires, São Paulo, Lima, Santiago, Bogotá, Caracas, and Montevideo became centers of power, drawing millions from countryside and abroad.

Technology and Material Culture

Railways, telegraphs, and steamships linked interior basins to coastal ports.
By the 1880s, rail lines climbed the Andes and spanned pampas and deserts; river steamers plied the Amazon, Orinoco, and Paraná–Paraguay. Telegraphs and later telephones connected capitals; radio and cinema shaped modern culture.
Architecture mirrored aspiration: neoclassical capitols, baroque cathedrals, and art-nouveau theaters proclaimed republican modernity. Industrialization—from Chilean copper smelters to Brazilian steel mills—transformed material life. Yet regional craft traditions endured: Andean textiles, Afro-Brazilian percussion, Mapuche weaving, and Amazonian ceramics sustained living heritage.

Movement and Interaction Corridors

Continental circulation reached unprecedented scale:

• Migration: European settlers (Italian, German, Spanish, Japanese) repopulated Brazil, Argentina, Chile, and Uruguay; internal migration urbanized Andean and coastal cities.

• Rivers and rails: The Amazon, Paraguay, and Magdalena bound hinterlands to export ports.

• Trade: Coffee, copper, nitrates, beef, and wool flowed to Atlantic and Pacific markets; oil joined after 1910.

• Integration projects: Early customs unions evolved into the ABC Pact (Argentina–Brazil–Chile) and the Latin American Free Trade Association (1960).

• Frontier expansion: Settlers, surveyors, and soldiers extended national authority into Amazonian forests and Patagonian plains, binding peripheries to capitals.

Cultural and Symbolic Expressions

Nations built mythologies of liberation and progress.
Romantic and modernist writers—José Hernández, Machado de Assis, Rubén Darío, Gabriela Mistral, Pablo Neruda, and Jorge Luis Borges—forged continental literatures. Visual art ranged from Andean costumbrismo to Mexican and Brazilian muralism, celebrating Indigenous and African heritage as foundations of identity.
Catholicism remained pervasive yet plural: popular pilgrimages and saints’ festivals persisted beside secular nationalism and new Protestant and Spiritist movements.
In the south, national narratives glorified frontier conquest; in the north, Andean and Amazonian cosmologies reemerged through indigenismo. Across the continent, dance and music—samba, tango, cueca, candombe, and vallenato—embodied the fusion of African, Indigenous, and European rhythms.

Environmental Adaptation and Resilience

Traditional ecological systems endured beneath modernization:
Andean terraces and irrigation persisted; Amazonian forest gardens maintained biodiversity; smallholders and Indigenous communities adapted global crops—potatoes, maize, cassava—to local microclimates.
Mechanized agriculture and deforestation redefined landscapes: soybean expansion in Brazil, sheep and wheat in Patagonia, sugar and cotton in northeast Brazil.
By the 1960s, environmental awareness emerged—parks in the Andes, conservation on Juan Fernández, and debates over Amazonian deforestation signaling a new consciousness of ecological limits.

Technology and Power Shifts (Conflict Dynamics)

The century and a half after independence was marked by recurring upheaval:

• Wars and diplomacy: The War of the Triple Alliance (1864–1870), War of the Pacific (1879–1883), and border arbitrations defined national boundaries.

• Social transformation: Abolition of slavery (Brazil, 1888), land reforms (Bolivia, Mexico, mid-20th century), and peasant mobilization challenged oligarchies.

• Political cycles: Liberal republics gave way to populist and military regimes—Vargas in Brazil, Perón in Argentina, Velasco Alvarado in Peru—each promising modernization and social justice.

• Revolution and reaction: Bolivia’s 1952 revolution, Cuba’s 1959 example, and guerrilla movements in Colombia and Venezuela framed Cold War geopolitics.

• Southern frontiers: Argentina and Chile militarized Patagonia and Tierra del Fuego; Britain maintained the Falklands; boundary disputes simmered through the 20th century.

Technological change—aviation, electrification, oil extraction, and hydroelectric power—accelerated modernization while deepening regional inequality.

Transition (to 1971 CE)

By 1971, South America was a continent of contradictions: industrial cities beside impoverished rural zones, democratic ideals shadowed by coups, and booming exports amid environmental decline.
In the north, Brazil, Venezuela, and Colombia led industrial and oil economies; in the south, Argentina, Chile, and Uruguay oscillated between prosperity and political crisis.
The Amazon, Andes, and Patagonia—long the continent’s ecological and symbolic pillars—entered the modern age as frontiers of extraction, conservation, and imagination.

From the Inca terraces to the steel towers of São Paulo, from the Guiana forests to the Falklands sheep ranges, South America by 1971 stood as a continent unified by geography yet divided by history—its republics striving toward equity, identity, and stewardship in a world it had long supplied, inspired, and endured.

South America Major (1828–1971 CE)

Republics, Frontiers, and Modern Transformations

Geographic Definition of South America Major
The subregion of South America Major encompasses all lands north of the Río Negro, extending across the full continental span of Brazil, Uruguay, Paraguay, northern Argentina and northern Chile, Bolivia, Peru, Ecuador(excluding the Cape lands at the Isthmian boundary), Colombia (excluding the Darién region, which belongs to Isthmian America), Venezuela, Guyana, Suriname, and French Guiana.

Anchors include the Andes cordillera and Altiplano, the Amazon basin, the Orinoco and Magdalena river systems, the Venezuelan Llanos, the Gran Chaco, the Uruguayan Pampas, and the Guiana Shield.
Bounded by Isthmian America to the north and Subcontinental South America to the south, this subregion forms the continental heartland of South America—linking the Pacific and Atlantic worlds through its intertwined highlands, forests, plains, and river systems.

Geography and Political Frontiers

Between 1828 and 1971, South America Major evolved from newly independent republics into a mosaic of modern nations. The Andes continued to define borders and identity; the Amazon, Gran Chaco, and Pampas became frontiers of settlement, extraction, and nation-building. The century and a half after independence saw shifting alliances, wars over territory, and the gradual incorporation of frontier zones into national economies.
The Pacific coast urbanized through ports like Lima, Guayaquil, and Valparaíso; Atlantic Brazil expanded through coffee and industry; and inland Bolivia, Paraguay, and Uruguay became landlocked crossroads of diplomacy and struggle. The Guianas remained colonial or semi-colonial enclaves until mid-century decolonization.

Climate and Environmental Shifts

The retreat of the Little Ice Age brought modest warming and rainfall fluctuations:

• Andes and Altiplano: Melting glaciers improved water availability for valleys but also triggered landslides and floods.

• Amazon basin: Rainfall cycles alternated between flood and drought decades, with deforestation beginning to affect local climates by the 20th century.

• Gran Chaco and Pampas: Droughts and locust plagues recurred through the 19th century; by the 20th, cattle ranching and grain cultivation transformed the landscape.

• Guiana forests and Llanos: Continued to alternate between wet and dry extremes, sustaining biodiversity yet increasingly opened by logging, mining, and plantations.

Environmental volatility shaped settlement patterns but also spurred innovation—irrigation in Andean valleys, drainage of pampas wetlands, and hydroelectric development along major rivers.

Subsistence and Settlement

Post-independence economies remained agrarian but diversified steadily:

• Andean republics (Peru, Bolivia, Ecuador, Colombia): Highland peasants maintained terraced maize–potato rotations; haciendas and plantations expanded in valleys. Mining revived—silver and tin in Bolivia, guano and nitrate in Peru, oil in Ecuador and Colombia.

• Brazil: Transitioned from sugar and gold to coffee (São Paulo, Rio de Janeiro), rubber (Amazon), and later industrial production (Belo Horizonte, São Paulo, Rio Grande do Sul).

• River Plate region (Argentina, Uruguay, Paraguay): Cattle and sheep ranching dominated, later joined by grain exports. Paraguay remained rural after devastating wars; Uruguay balanced pastoral exports and political stability.

• Venezuela and Colombia: Coffee, cocoa, and oil reshaped economies; ranching persisted in the Llanos.

• Guianas: Plantation agriculture (sugar, rice) persisted under British, French, and Dutch control, worked by Afro-descended and Indo-Asian laborers.

Urbanization accelerated: Buenos Aires, Rio de Janeiro, Lima, Santiago, Bogotá, Quito, and Caracas became political and economic capitals, concentrating power and population.

Technology and Material Culture

Railways, telegraphs, and steamships integrated fragmented landscapes.
In the 19th century, rail lines climbed the Andes (e.g., Oroya Railway, Quito–Guayaquil) and linked interior ranches and mines to ports. Steam navigation on the Amazon and Paraná–Paraguay rivers expanded trade and migration.
European architectural styles—neoclassical capitals, baroque churches, and eclectic civic buildings—symbolized modernization.
Local crafts persisted: Andean textiles, Amazonian ceramics, Guaraní carvings, and Afro-Brazilian percussion instruments. By the 20th century, industrialization brought steelworks (São Paulo, Caracas), automobiles (Buenos Aires), and aviation links across the continent.

Movement and Interaction Corridors

Continental circulation intensified:

• River systems: The Amazon, Orinoco, Paraná–Paraguay, and Magdalena became arteries of commerce and colonization.

• Rail networks: Linked mines and ranches to ports, knitting national markets.

• Migration: Italian, German, Spanish, and Japanese immigrants settled Brazil, Argentina, Uruguay, and Paraguay, transforming agriculture and culture.

• Slave emancipation and internal migration: Brazil abolished slavery in 1888, and freed populations moved into cities and frontiers.

• Oil routes: Pipelines and refineries in Venezuela, Colombia, and Ecuador shifted economies toward energy export.

Regional trade blocs, from early customs unions to mid-20th-century cooperation schemes, sought continental integration, while European and North American investment reshaped industrial growth.

Cultural and Symbolic Expressions

National identities crystallized from colonial legacies.
Romantic nationalism and liberal reform inspired literature, painting, and architecture celebrating Indigenous and creole heritage: Bolívarian epics, José Hernández’s Martín Fierro, Machado de Assis, Rubén Darío, and Andean costumbrismo.
In the 20th century, modernismo, muralism (led by Diego Rivera and Cándido Portinari), and revolutionary art redefined visual culture.
Catholicism remained pervasive but adapted: popular pilgrimages (e.g., Virgen de Copacabana, Círio de Nazaré) coexisted with secular nationalism and Protestant missions.
Afro-descended and Indigenous cultural forms—candomblé, samba, marimba, and Andean panpipe music—entered national consciousness as emblems of authenticity.

Environmental Adaptation and Resilience

Peasant and Indigenous communities maintained ecological knowledge despite land concentration:

• Highland terraces and irrigation persisted for local autonomy.

• Amazonian forest management—rubber tapping, shifting gardens, and agroforestry—balanced extraction with sustainability until industrial overreach in the mid-20th century.

• Ranching and agriculture expanded dramatically across the Pampas and cerrado, transforming ecosystems.

• Dams and deforestation along the Amazon and Paraná altered river regimes by the 1960s, initiating modern environmental debates.

Throughout, traditional practices—from Andean vertical exchange to Guaraní collective farming—anchored cultural and ecological continuity.

Technology and Power Shifts (Conflict Dynamics)

Wars and revolutions marked the region’s political evolution:

• Post-independence conflicts: Civil wars, caudillo rivalries, and frontier disputes shaped early republics.

• Major wars: War of the Triple Alliance (1864–1870) decimated Paraguay; War of the Pacific (1879–1883) redrew borders between Chile, Peru, and Bolivia.

• Reforms and revolutions: Abolition of slavery (Brazil 1888), republican overthrow of the monarchy (Brazil 1889), and land reforms in Mexico and Bolivia signaled social transformation.

• 20th-century shifts: Populist regimes (Vargas in Brazil, Perón in Argentina), revolutions (Bolivia 1952, Cuba 1959), and guerrilla movements (Colombia, Venezuela) redefined state–society relations.

• External influences: The Good Neighbor Policy and Cold War interventions tied the region to U.S. geopolitical strategies, particularly during the 1960s and early 1970s.

Technological modernization—railways, telephones, automobiles, oil drilling, and aviation—interwove with social upheaval and uneven industrialization.

Transition (to 1971 CE)

By 1971, South America Major had completed its passage from colonial dependency to diverse modernity.
The region’s republics faced contrasts: booming urban economies alongside rural poverty, democratic aspirations shadowed by coups and authoritarianism.
The Andes still bore terraces and mines older than empire; the Amazon and Guianas remained ecological frontiers; and the Pampas and Llanos powered global agriculture.
From liberation heroes to modern reformers, the quest for sovereignty, equity, and identity defined this long age.
Despite enduring inequality and deforestation, South America Major emerged as a continent of resilience—its highlands, forests, plains, and coasts still bound by the enduring geography that had shaped all its worlds.

The history of the Brazilian republic is also the story of the development of the army as a national institution.

The elimination of the monarchy had reduced the number of national institutions to one, the army.

Although the Roman Catholic Church continues its presence throughout the country, it is not national but rather international in its personnel, doctrine, liturgy, and purposes.

By the time of the 1964 coup, the political parties will not be national parties; they will be oriented more along regional, personalist, and special-interest lines.

Only in the struggle to reestablish civilian rule in the 1980s will a fitful process of creating national parties take shape.

Thus, the army is the core of the developing Brazilian state, a marked change from the marginal role that it had played during the empire.

The army assumes this new position almost haphazardly, filling part of the vacuum left by the col- lapse of the monarchy and gradually acquiring a doctrine and vision to support its de facto role.

Although it has more units and men in Rio de Janeiro and Rio Grande do Sul than elsewhere, its presence is felt throughout the country.

Its personnel, its interests, its ideology, and its commitments are national in scope.

The Brazilian republic's first decade is one of turmoil.

It appears to be a pattern of Brazilian history that seemingly peaceful regime changes are followed by long periods of adjustment, often scarred by violence.

Years of "regime change" in 1889, 1930, and 1964 will introduce protracted adjustment that involves some authoritarian rule.

Curiously, because the violence will occur over long periods, usually without overturning the government in Rio de Janeiro or Brasilia, Brazil will acquire an undeserved reputation for having a nonviolent history of political and social compromise.

The founders of the Brazilian republic face a serious question of legitimacy.

How can an illegal, treasonous act establish a legal political order?

The officers who had joined Field Marshal Deodoro da Fonseca in ending the empire were violating solemn oaths to uphold emperor and empire.

The officer corps will eventually resolve the contradiction by linking its duty and destiny to Brazil, the motherland, rather than to transitory governments.

In addition, the republic has been born rather accidentally: Deodoro had intended only to replace the cabinet, but the republicans had manipulated him into fathering a republic.

The Brazilian republic is not a spiritual offspring of the republics born of the French or American revolutions, even though the Brazilian regime will attempt to associate itself with both.

The republic does not have enough popular support to risk open elections.

It is a regime born of a coup d'etat that maintains itself by force.

The republicans make Deodoro president (1889-91) and, after a financial crisis, appoint Field Marshal Floriano Vieira Peixoto minister of war to ensure the allegiance of the military.

Indeed, the Brazilian people are bystanders to the events shaping their history.

In the last decades of the nineteenth century, the United States, much of Europe, and neighboring Argentina expand the right to vote.

Brazil, however, moves to restrict access to the polls.

In 1874, in a population of about ten million, the franchise had been held by about one million, but in 1881 this had been cut to 145,296.

This reduction was one reason the empire's legitimacy had foundered, but the republic does not move to correct the situation.

By 1910 there will be only 627,000 voters in a population of twenty-two million.

Throughout the 1920s, only between 2.3 percent and 3.4 percent of the total population will vote.

The instability and violence of the 1890s in Brazil are related to the absence of consensus among the elites regarding a governmental model; and the armed forces are divided over their status, relationship to the political regime, and institutional goals.

The lack of military unity and the disagreement among civilian elites about the military's role in society explain partially why a long-term military dictatorship has not been established, as some officers advocating positivism want.

However, military men are very active in politics; early in the decade, ten of the twenty state governors are officers.

The Constituent Assembly that draws up the Brazilian constitution of 1891 is a battleground between those seeking to limit executive power, which is dictatorial under President Deodoro da Fonseca, and the Jacobins, radical authoritarians who oppose the Paulista coffee oligarchy and who want to preserve and intensify presidential authority.

The new charter establishes a federation governed supposedly by a president, a bicameral National Congress (Congresso Nacional; hereafter, Congress), and a judiciary.

However, real power is in the regional pátrias and in the hands of local potentates, called "colonels" (coronets, coronelismo).

Thus, the constitutional system does not work as that document had envisaged.

It will take until the end of the decade for an informal but real distribution of power, the so-called politics of the governors, to take shape as the result of armed struggles and bargaining.

Article 14 on the Brazilian military is particularly important for the future.

It declared the army and navy to be permanent national institutions responsible for maintaining law and order and for ensuring the continuance of the three constitutional powers.

Officers insist on the statement of permanent status because they fear  that the elites will disband their services.

The armed forces are to be the moderator of the system, and military officers are Brazil's only constitutionally mandated elite.

The article also requires the military to be obedient to the president but "within the limits of the law."

Thus, the armed forces are to obey only if they determine a presidential order to be legal.

Oddly, military officials are less than enthusiastic about discretionary obedience, which they see as subversive; the civilian politicians, however, want it as a check on presidential power.

Interestingly, the constitutions of 1934 and 1946 will keep the discretionary clause unaltered.

However, the 1937 constitution of the dictatorial Estado Novo, a military regime in civilian dress, will put the military securely under obedience to the president.

In the election that follows the adoption of Brazil's new constitution in 1891, Deodoro da Fonseca and Floriano Peixoto are elected president and vice president, respectively, but with the former gaining only 129 votes and the latter 153.

The first president, Deodoro da Fonseca, has difficulty adjusting to sharing power with Congress and, in imperial fashion, dissolves it in November 1891, provoking rebellions in the navy and in Rio Grande do Sul.

To mollify the opposition, he resigns in favor of Vice President Peixoto (acting president, 1891-94).

Peixoto, known as the "Iron Marshal" (marechal de ferro), ousts all the state governors who had supported Deodoro, provoking violence in many parts of the country.

One of the bloodiest of these struggles is the civil war that explodes in Rio Grande do Sul in 1893 and soon spreads into Santa Catarina and Parana, pitting former monarchist liberals against republicans.

Concurrently, the fleet in Guanabara Bay at Rio de Janeiro challenges Peixoto, and the naval revolt quickly becomes linked to the struggle in the South.

Peixoto's diplomat in Washington, Salvador de Mendonca, with the help of New York businessman Charles Flint, is able to assemble a squadron of ships with American crews, which proves decisive in ending the standoff in Guanabara Bay.

The United States government, interested in Brazilian commerce and in the republic's survival, permits this mercenary effort to occur and sends several cruisers to provide a barely concealed escort.

This is the first documented American intervention in Brazil's internal affairs, and significantly it has been organized privately.