The Manchus continue the Confucian civil service system

Although Chinese are barred from the highest offices, Chinese officials predominate over Manchu officeholders outside the capital, except in military positions.

The Neo-Confucian philosophy, emphasizing the obedience of subject to ruler, is enforced as the state creed.

The Manchu emperors also support Chinese literary and historical projects of enormous scope; the survival of much of China's ancient literature is attributed to these projects.

The Qing rulers, ever suspicious of Han Chinese, put into effect measures aimed at preventing the absorption of the Manchus into the dominant Han Chinese population.

Han Chinese are prohibited from migrating into the Manchu homeland, and Manchus are forbidden to engage in trade or manual labor.

Intermarriage between the two groups is forbidden.

In many government positions a system of dual appointments is used—the Chinese appointee is required to do the substantive work and the Manchu to ensure Han loyalty to Qing rule.

Shinto eventually assumes an intellectual form as shaped by neo-Confucian rationalism and materialism.

The kokugaku movement emerges from the interactions of these two belief systems.

Kokugaku contributes to the emperor-centered nationalism of modern Japan and the revival of Shinto as a national creed in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries.

The Kojiki, Nihongi, and Man'yoshu are all studied anew in the search for the Japanese spirit.

Some purists in the kokugaku movement even criticize the Confucian and Buddhist influences—in effect, foreign one —for contaminating Japan's ancient ways.

Japan is the land of the kami and, as such, has a special destiny.

East Europe (1660–1671 CE): Consolidation and Strategic Realignment

Political and Military Developments

Stabilization Following Turmoil

Between 1660 and 1671 CE, Muscovy focused on consolidating territories gained from previous upheavals, particularly the integration of Cossack regions following the Khmelnytsky Uprising. The period was marked by deliberate administrative measures to stabilize governance and ensure long-term political control.

Diplomatic Adjustments and Alliances

Diplomatic relations shifted significantly, reflecting Muscovy's strengthened position and its strategic interests. Alliances were carefully managed, especially concerning Poland-Lithuania, Sweden, and the Ottoman Empire, to maintain regional stability.

Military Strengthening and Defense

Muscovy continued to enhance its military capacities, focusing on improving fortifications and modernizing armed forces. These efforts were critical for defending newly acquired territories and securing Muscovy’s expanded borders.

Economic and Technological Developments

Economic Integration and Prosperity

Economic conditions improved notably as trade networks stabilized and expanded, particularly in territories annexed during the previous decade. Increased economic integration facilitated growth in regional markets and urban economies.

Continued Technological Advancements

Technological progress persisted, particularly in military fortifications, transportation infrastructure, and agricultural productivity. These innovations enhanced regional economic stability and defensive capabilities.

Cultural and Artistic Developments

Cultural Patronage and Growth

Cultural activities flourished under continued Romanov patronage, resulting in significant advancements in architecture, religious art, and cultural endeavors. These developments enriched Muscovite cultural identity and heritage.

Scholarly and Literary Continuity

Intellectual and literary pursuits remained vibrant, with scholars and chroniclers actively documenting political changes, social developments, and cultural achievements. These activities were vital for preserving historical knowledge and cultural continuity.

Settlement Patterns and Urban Development

Strategic Urban Expansion

Urban centers continued to grow strategically, with Moscow and other major cities benefiting from improved urban planning and infrastructure projects. Administrative effectiveness and economic prosperity supported sustained urban development.

Reinforced Urban Fortifications

Urban fortifications continued to receive significant attention, ensuring robust defenses that protected cities from potential threats, supporting regional stability and security.

Social and Religious Developments

Enhanced Social Integration

Efforts to maintain social cohesion continued, effectively integrating diverse ethnic and regional groups into the Muscovite administrative and societal framework, further reinforcing regional harmony and stability.

Orthodox Church’s Strengthened Role

The Orthodox Church’s influence grew further, extending its role in education, community life, and cultural integration across newly consolidated territories. The Church’s role was pivotal in supporting societal stability and cultural unity.

Long-Term Consequences and Historical Significance

The period from 1660 to 1671 CE was characterized by strategic territorial consolidation, diplomatic realignment, and sustained cultural development. These efforts reinforced Muscovy's regional dominance, providing essential foundations for future political stability, territorial integrity, and cultural cohesion.

Increased state taxes and regulations under Russia's new code exacerbate the social discontent that has been simmering since the Time of Troubles.

In the 1650s and 1660s, the number of peasant escapes increases dramatically.

A favorite refuge is the Don River region, domain of the Don Cossacks.

A major uprising occurs in the Volga region in 1670 and 1671.

Stenka Razin, a Cossack who is from the Don River region, leads a revolt that draws together wealthy Cossacks who are well established in the region and escaped serfs seeking free land.

The unexpected uprising sweeps up the Volga River valley and even threatens Moscow.

Tsarist troops finally defeat the rebels after they have occupied major cities along the Volga in an operation whose panache captures the imaginations of later generations of Russians.

Razin is publicly tortured and executed.

Northeast Europe (1660–1671 CE): Consolidation of Power, Diplomatic Stability, and Cultural Growth

Between 1660 and 1671 CE, Northeast Europe transitioned into a period of relative stability following significant earlier conflicts, characterized by diplomatic consolidation, sustained Swedish power, cautious Muscovite ambitions, and cultural and economic growth. This period marked strategic realignments among regional powers and increased prosperity in urban centers.

Sweden's Territorial Consolidation and Governance

Under Charles XI (from 1660, with regency until 1672), Sweden continued consolidating its territorial acquisitions in Livonia, Estonia, Scania, and other Baltic territories secured through the Treaty of Roskilde (1658). Sweden enhanced administrative governance and military fortifications in key strategic cities, notably Reval (Tallinn), Riga, and Narva, reinforcing its status as the leading regional power.

Denmark–Norway’s Efforts Toward Stability

Following territorial losses to Sweden, Frederick III of Denmark–Norway concentrated on internal governance reforms, strengthening royal authority and stabilizing economic and social structures. Diplomatic efforts prioritized peace and strategic alliances to counterbalance continued Swedish dominance, setting foundations for future recovery.

Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth's Internal Struggles and Stability Efforts

The Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth, under John II Casimir Vasa until his abdication in 1668, grappled with ongoing internal divisions and external threats. Despite challenges, diplomatic initiatives and internal reforms aimed to restore administrative efficiency, military capabilities, and economic stability, cautiously preserving the Commonwealth’s regional influence.

Muscovy’s Strategic Preparations and Expansion

Under Tsar Alexis I, Muscovy steadily reinforced internal stability and administrative governance, cautiously preparing for future territorial expansions into contested regions. Diplomatic activities emphasized strategic patience, maintaining careful regional engagement, and gradually strengthening military capabilities in anticipation of future opportunities.

Prussian Neutrality and Economic Prosperity

The Duchy of Prussia, under Duke Frederick William I (the Great Elector), maintained strategic neutrality and strong internal governance, fostering continued economic growth. Königsberg and other Prussian cities flourished economically, reinforcing Prussia’s status as a stable and influential entity amid regional uncertainties.

Economic Flourishing in Major Urban Centers

Cities including Reval (Tallinn), Riga, Königsberg, and Visby continued thriving economically through robust maritime trade, strengthened merchant networks, and efficient urban governance. Their prosperity bolstered regional stability and facilitated economic integration, despite broader geopolitical complexities.

Cultural and Educational Development

Protestant educational and cultural institutions experienced sustained growth, particularly through Lutheran influences. Universities, academies, and scholarly societies flourished, advancing literacy rates, cultural expression, and intellectual discourse, significantly enriching Northeast Europe's cultural heritage.

Scientific Advancements and Intellectual Exchanges

Northeast Europe continued its strong tradition in science and scholarship, notably influenced by figures such as Tycho Brahe. Regional scholars significantly advanced astronomy, mathematics, and natural sciences, enhancing the area's reputation as a prominent center of intellectual and scientific innovation.

Strategic Diplomatic Realignments

Diplomatic interactions during this period reflected strategic caution and stability-oriented realignments. Regional powers, including Sweden, Denmark–Norway, Poland–Lithuania, Muscovy, and Prussia, engaged in careful diplomatic negotiations to balance territorial interests, maintain stability, and manage ongoing geopolitical tensions.

Legacy of the Era

The era from 1660 to 1671 CE profoundly influenced Northeast Europe's historical evolution through diplomatic consolidation, cautious territorial ambitions, and notable cultural achievements. These developments established enduring regional alignments, diplomatic relationships, and cultural identities, significantly shaping the region’s subsequent historical trajectory.

East Central Europe (1660–1671 CE): Stabilization, Reconstruction, and Ottoman Pressures

Between 1660 and 1671 CE, East Central Europe—covering modern-day Poland, Czechia, Slovakia, Hungary, and eastern Germany and Austria east of 10°E and north of the defined boundary—experienced gradual stabilization following decades of warfare, though new challenges arose, particularly from Ottoman expansion. The region undertook significant political consolidation, economic recovery, and cultural revitalization, even as the Ottoman Empire intensified its pressure on Hungary and Habsburg territories, setting the stage for future conflicts.

Political and Military Developments

Ottoman Pressure and Hungarian Instability

• The Ottoman Empire intensified military pressure on Habsburg-controlled Royal Hungary, initiating campaigns that led to territorial shifts, notably the capture of Nagyvárad (Oradea) in 1660.

• Ottoman advances prompted defensive alliances and intensified fortifications in Hungary, Austria, and Croatia, as Emperor Leopold I (r. 1658–1705) sought to stabilize his frontier.

Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth: Recovery and Struggles

• Poland-Lithuania, severely weakened by earlier Swedish and Russian invasions, entered a fragile recovery under King John II Casimir (r. 1648–1668). Internal conflicts, magnate feuds, and the debilitating liberum veto weakened central authority, leaving Poland vulnerable to future crises.

Brandenburg-Prussian Consolidation

• Under Frederick William, the "Great Elector" (r. 1640–1688), Brandenburg-Prussia strengthened its administrative centralization, military modernization, and diplomatic stature, increasingly becoming a significant regional power.

Economic and Technological Developments

Economic Recovery and Revitalization

• The region gradually recovered economically, especially in agriculture and trade. Bohemia, Moravia, and Silesia saw improvements in agricultural productivity, manufacturing, and mining activities, aided by restored trade networks and stabilized population growth.

• Brandenburg-Prussia actively fostered economic development, improving infrastructure, promoting immigration of skilled workers, and boosting urban economies.

Technological and Agricultural Innovations

• Adoption of advanced agricultural techniques, including crop rotation and more efficient farming equipment, improved yields across Austria, Bohemia, and Saxony, facilitating demographic recovery and economic revitalization.

Cultural and Artistic Developments

Flourishing Baroque Culture

• Baroque artistic and architectural patronage flourished, symbolizing renewed confidence, Catholic Counter-Reformation vigor, and princely power. Major projects included palaces, churches, and public buildings in Vienna, Prague, and Warsaw.

• Literature, theater, and music experienced renewed vitality, reflecting stabilizing social conditions and elite patronage.

Settlement and Urban Development

Continued Urban Reconstruction and Expansion

• Urban recovery accelerated, with significant reconstruction efforts enhancing cities such as Vienna, Dresden, Prague, Kraków, and Leipzig, restoring their roles as commercial and administrative centers.

• Strategic fortification of frontier cities, particularly in Hungary and along the Habsburg-Ottoman border, intensified in response to Ottoman threats.

Social and Religious Developments

Religious Consolidation and Sectarian Stability

• Religious life stabilized along the lines drawn by the Treaty of Westphalia, solidifying Protestant and Catholic regions.

• The Catholic Church, particularly within Habsburg territories, expanded educational and missionary activities, strengthening religious uniformity in Austria, Bohemia, and Hungary.

Social Recovery and Aristocratic Dominance

• Aristocratic power consolidated further, particularly in Poland and Hungary, reinforcing noble privileges and weakening central royal authority. The nobility maintained significant control over land and economic resources.

Long-Term Consequences and Historical Significance

The era from 1660 to 1671 CE marked East Central Europe’s tentative recovery from decades of devastating conflict, fostering economic revival and cultural rejuvenation. However, persistent Ottoman pressure, internal Polish-Lithuanian fragility, and rising Brandenburg-Prussian ambitions foreshadowed future geopolitical conflicts. These developments solidified social and religious structures, laid essential foundations for later absolutist governance, and significantly shaped the region’s political and cultural trajectory into the late 17th century.

Eastern Southeast Europe (1660–1671 CE): Deepening Ottoman Challenges and Cultural Resilience

Settlement and Migration Patterns

Ottoman Population Management

Between 1660 and 1671, the Ottoman Empire intensified its resettlement policies, moving Muslim settlers from Anatolia into strategically important areas of Eastern Southeast Europe, particularly in Bulgaria and regions along the Danube. These demographic changes aimed to strengthen control, leading to increased tensions with the indigenous Christian populations.

Rural Isolation and Preservation

Amid heightened Ottoman pressures, many rural villages remained isolated from direct Ottoman influence. This isolation enabled the preservation of traditional customs, folk culture, and local institutions, especially in Bulgaria and mountainous regions of Serbia.

Political Dynamics and Regional Rivalries

Continued Wallachian and Moldavian Instability

Following the earlier conflicts between Matei Basarab and Vasile Lupu, political instability continued in Wallachiaand Moldavia, with succession crises and princely rivalries frequent. Ottoman interference increased, exploiting internal divisions and weakening the principalities’ political autonomy.

Hajduk Resistance Intensifies

Hajduk activity intensified throughout the region, especially in Serbia and Bulgaria. These outlaw groups grew bolder, openly challenging Ottoman authority and becoming increasingly symbolic of resistance, further embedding them into local folklore and national consciousness.

Economic and Technological Developments

Strained Economic Conditions

The ongoing regional instability and increased Ottoman taxation strained local economies, particularly affecting agricultural productivity. However, trade along the Danube and with Western Europe continued, providing a crucial lifeline for regional economies and fostering limited prosperity in towns like Chiprovtsi.

Local Craft and Trade Resilience

Despite economic pressures, craft industries, particularly metallurgy, weaving, and pottery, maintained resilience, especially in semi-autonomous areas. Towns like Chiprovtsi retained economic significance through local artisanal production and trade connections with Central Europe.

Cultural and Artistic Developments

Continued Orthodox and Catholic Patronage

Orthodox and Catholic religious institutions in Wallachia, Moldavia, and western-influenced Bulgarian towns such as Chiprovtsi continued to thrive under local patronage. Monasteries, churches, and educational institutions benefited from princely and local noble support, maintaining vibrant artistic and scholarly traditions.

Cultural Revival in Rural Areas

Rural communities, particularly in Bulgaria and Serbia, preserved and even revitalized traditional cultural expressions, including folk music, oral poetry, and religious festivals. These traditions became increasingly central to the emerging sense of national identity amid external pressures.

Social and Religious Developments

Persistent Religious Tensions and Autonomy

Religious tensions remained significant, yet the Ottoman millet system allowed Christian communities substantial religious autonomy. The Orthodox Church continued to serve as a key institution for preserving local identity and cultural traditions amid external Islamic influence.

Increasing Role of Local Leaders

Local community leaders, including village elders and church officials, played crucial roles in maintaining social cohesion and negotiating with Ottoman authorities. These figures often mitigated the worst impacts of Ottoman policies, preserving local traditions and autonomy.

Key Historical Events and Developments

• 1660s: Increased resettlement of Anatolian populations into strategic regions of Bulgaria and the lower Danube area.

• 1660–1670: Intensified hajduk activity in Serbia and Bulgaria, highlighting growing resistance to Ottoman rule and fostering increased national consciousness.

• Continued cultural patronage and revival, especially in semi-autonomous regions like Chiprovtsi.

Long-Term Consequences and Historical Significance

The period from 1660 to 1671 CE saw deepening Ottoman administrative pressures, intensified local resistance, and cultural resilience within Eastern Southeast Europe. These factors contributed significantly to the region's emerging national identities, laying the groundwork for later movements seeking political autonomy and independence from Ottoman rule.

The Middle East: 1660–1671 CE

Omani Maritime Expansion

Under Imam Sultan bin Saif al-Ya'aruba, Oman's Yarubid dynasty consolidates its maritime influence across the Persian Gulf and the Indian Ocean, extending its control over key strategic locations. Omani naval power successfully secures important trading ports along the East African coast, including Zanzibar and Mombasa, establishing a robust trade network and spreading Omani cultural and political influence. The enhanced naval presence significantly boosts Oman's economic prosperity and regional stature.

Ottoman Political and Military Challenges

During this era, Sultan Mehmed IV of the Ottoman Empire faces significant military and political challenges, particularly from ongoing conflicts with European powers and internal rebellions. The prolonged war with the Republic of Venice and the Habsburg Empire strains the empire’s military resources, especially in the European territories. Meanwhile, administrative reforms aim to reinforce central authority, although provincial rebellions and political intrigues continue to undermine stability.

Safavid Internal Consolidation

In Safavid Iran, Shah Abbas II continues fostering cultural and economic growth, building upon the successes of his early reign. Isfahan flourishes culturally, renowned for its artistic achievements, impressive architecture, and bustling marketplaces. Abbas II invests in strengthening administrative control, ensuring internal stability through strategic appointments and consolidation of authority. His reign is marked by relative peace within the empire, which allows trade and cultural endeavors to flourish.

Aleppo as a Commercial Nexus

Aleppo maintains its critical role as a hub for trade between East and West, benefiting from stable trade relations despite broader regional conflicts. The city's markets remain vibrant, attracting European, Persian, Ottoman, and Arab merchants, thus securing Aleppo's status as an economic and cultural crossroads. The city's prosperity is evident in the sustained production and exchange of textiles, spices, and luxury items.

Legacy of the Era

The era 1660–1671 sees Omani maritime power reach new heights with strategic expansion into East Africa, securing lasting economic influence in the region. Concurrently, the Ottoman Empire struggles with external pressures and internal unrest, highlighting vulnerabilities in its vast domains. Safavid Iran under Shah Abbas II enjoys stability and cultural vibrancy, further solidifying Isfahan's reputation as a thriving imperial capital. Together, these developments mark an era of dynamic shifts and enduring legacies across the Middle East.