Zong's owners, on news of the …
Years: 1783 - 1783
March
Zong's owners, on news of the disastrous voyage reaching Britain, had claimed compensation from their insurers for the loss of the slaves.
The insurers had refused to honor the claim and the owners have taken them to court.
Zong's logbook had gone missing after the ship reached Jamaica, two years before the hearings start.
The legal proceedings provide almost all the documentary evidence about the massacre but there is no formal record of the first trial other than what is referred to in the appeals hearing.
The ship's insurers claim that the log had been deliberately destroyed, which the Gregson syndicate denies.
Almost all the surviving source material is of questionable reliability.
The two witnesses who give evidence, Robert Stubbs and James Kelsall, are strongly motivated to exonerate themselves from blame.
It is possible that the figures concerning the number of slaves killed, the amount of water that remained on the ship, and the distance beyond Jamaica that Zong had mistakenly sailed are inaccurate.
The insurers had refused to honor the claim and the owners have taken them to court.
Zong's logbook had gone missing after the ship reached Jamaica, two years before the hearings start.
The legal proceedings provide almost all the documentary evidence about the massacre but there is no formal record of the first trial other than what is referred to in the appeals hearing.
The ship's insurers claim that the log had been deliberately destroyed, which the Gregson syndicate denies.
Almost all the surviving source material is of questionable reliability.
The two witnesses who give evidence, Robert Stubbs and James Kelsall, are strongly motivated to exonerate themselves from blame.
It is possible that the figures concerning the number of slaves killed, the amount of water that remained on the ship, and the distance beyond Jamaica that Zong had mistakenly sailed are inaccurate.
