Sultan Shah, a claimant to the title of Khwarazm Shah from 1172, has over the past several years remained a threat to his brother Tekish, who has been forced to conduct expeditions into Khurasan several times as a result.

Despite this, Sultan Shah has been unable to make any significant gains against his brother.

He also has had occasional problems with the Ghurids in Afghanistan; in an 1189/1190 campaign they had invaded his territory, defeated him and took some of his possessions.

Sultan Shah had decided in 1192 to launch an expedition against Khwarazm, taking advantage of Tekish's absence there; the latter is at the time in western Iran dealing with the Seljuqs of Hamadan.

While the campaign is underway, however, he dies in 1193 and Tekish seizes some of his possessions, reuniting the Khwarazmid lands.

The state of Ajmer fails to fulfill the tribute demands as per the custom after a defeat; as a consequence, Qutb-ud-din Aibak in 1193 takes over Ajmer and soon establishes Ghurid control in northern and central India.

Rajput kingdoms such as Saraswati, Samana, …

…Kohram and Hansi are captured without any difficulty.

The forces of Qutb-ud-din Aibak finally advance on Delhi, capturing it soon after the Battle of Chandwar(modern Firozabad), on the Jumna River close to Agra, a surprise attack on Raja Jaichand of Kannauj.

Mu'izz ad-Din returns west to Ghazni to deal with the threat to his western frontiers from the unrest in Iran, but he appoints Aibak as his regional governor for northern India, using Delhi as a base to further enlarge his growing empire.

The Ghurid armies, mostly under Turkic generals, continue to advance through northern India, raiding as far east as Bengal.

Aibak ransacks Ayodhya temples in 1193, followed by his conquest of Delhi.

Evidence in literature suggests that in 1193, Muhammad Khilji, a general under the command of Qutb-ud-Din, sacks and burns Nalanda, India's greatest Buddhist university.

Richard I of England, having been informed that his brother, John Lackland, was attempting to usurp the throne in England, had arranged for a treaty with Saladin, and the Third Crusade had come to an end when Richard rashly left for England in late October.

However, Philip of France meanwhile had come to terms with John and had closed the French harbors; Richard, forced to make his way across the Adriatic Sea, had gone ashore near Aquileia.

Due to the coming winter, crossing the Alps has proved to be impossible, and the king, incognito, passes through the Austrian capital Vienna shortly before Christmas, where he is recognized, captured and imprisoned at Dürnstein by Duke Leopold, who has not forgotten the slight at Acre.

Philip II’s Diplomatic and Propaganda War Against Richard I (1192–1193)

As Richard I remained in the East following the Third Crusade, Philip II of France intensified his efforts to undermine Richard’s rule, both through diplomatic manipulation and propaganda. His goal was to seize Angevin-controlled lands in France, particularly the Vexin and Normandy, while weakening Richard’s authority among his vassals.

Philip’s Forged Claims to the Vexin (January 1192)

• On January 20, 1192, Philip met with William FitzRalph, Richard’s seneschal of Normandy, and several Norman barons.
• He presented documents purporting to be from Richard, claiming that at Messina (1191), Richard had agreed to cede disputed lands back to Philip.
• However, having received no direct communication from Richard, FitzRalph and the Norman barons rejected Philip’s claim, seeing it as fraudulent and opportunistic.

Philip’s Propaganda Campaign Against Richard I

Philip then turned to disinformation, spreading false rumors about Richard’s conduct in the Holy Land to discredit him among his subjects. The fabricated accusations included:

1. Treasonous communication with Saladin – Claiming that Richard had secretly negotiated with the Muslim leader, undermining the Crusader cause.
2. Deliberate betrayal of Christian strongholds – Suggesting that Richard had conspired to cause the fall of Gaza, Jaffa, and Ascalon.
3. Complicity in the murder of Conrad of Montferrat – Accusing Richard of orchestrating the assassination of Conrad, who was chosen as King of Jerusalem shortly before his death in 1192.

These false allegations were designed to sow distrust among Richard’s allies and vassals, both in England and on the Continent.

Philip’s Alliance with Prince John (1193)

• As part of his plan to destabilize Richard’s rule, Philip contacted Prince John, Richard’s younger brother, and convinced him to turn against his brother.
• In early 1193, John visited Philip in Paris, where he paid homage for Richard’s continental lands, effectively declaring himself as Philip’s vassal.
• This act was a direct challenge to Richard’s authority, signaling John’s readiness to betray his absent brother in exchange for power.

Impact of Philip’s Actions

• Philip successfully weakened Angevin authority in France, fueling rebellion and discontent.
• John’s allegiance to Philip created instability in England, leading to a succession crisis in Richard’s absence.
• Philip’s forged documents and propaganda campaign further eroded Richard’s reputation, preparing the way for his next move against the Angevin Empire.

Philip’s scheming against Richard was part of his broader strategy to dismantle Plantagenet power in France, a goal that would accelerate with Richard’s capture and imprisonment later in 1193.