Popular stories about the prophet Daniel—one concerning his exposure (to King Cyrus) of a huge idol falsely believed to consume huge quantities of food and drink; the other an account of Daniel’s poisoning of a dragon worshiped as a god and his subsequent scheduled punishment of death in the lions’ den (he miraculously survives, unmolested for six days)—are probably written about 130, and known as Bel and the Dragon, the name given to chapter 14 of the extended Book of Daniel, which exists only in Koine Greek in the Septuagint.
Excluded from the Hebrew/Aramaic text of Daniel, this chapter, along with chapter 13, is referred to as deuterocanonical, in that it is not universally accepted among Christians as belonging to the canonical works accepted as the Bible.
The text is viewed as canonical by Catholics but as apocryphal by Protestants and typically not found in modern Protestant Bibles, though it was in the original 1611 edition of the King James Version.
It is listed in Article VI of the Thirty-Nine Articles of the Church of England.
The traditional theory that Daniel was the original author of the Book of Daniel has been disputed by recent scholars.
Critics of Daniel view the Book of Daniel as a pseudepigraph dated around 165 BCE that concerns itself primarily with the Maccabean era and the reign of the Seleucid king Antiochus Epiphanes.
Those who share this view typically adhere to the Maccabean thesis when analyzing the Book of Daniel.
The stories of chapters 1-6 are considered to be a literary genre of legends that are older than the visions of chapters 7-12.
The visions in the latter half of Daniel are theorized to be written by an anonymous author in the Maccabean era, who assembles the legends with the visions as one book, in the second century BCE.
According to this view, it is not considered to be read as a prophecy of western political history or of an eschatological future.
Rather, the critical focus is on the witness to the religiosity of the Maccabean time period.